Walking Forum

Main Boards => Gear => Topic started by: alan de enfield on 19:35:50, 22/02/18

Title: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 19:35:50, 22/02/18

A (very) long time walker and forum lurker. Getting back into walking during the last couple of years following medical advice.
Walked many long distance walks in the 70's/80's but 'life' eventually got in the way.


I purchased a 'Nature Hike' (Chinese) tent a couple of years ago. I have not had any problems with it, and its never leaked a drop, but was thinking of updating my equipment and going a little more 'lightweight'.


This 2-Man tent weighs in, (complete), at 1240 grams (1322g packed) and I've been struggling to find a reasonably priced alternative that offers any weight savings.
The best I have found is the MSR Reflex 2.


I am sure there are some quality differences between the 'brand' tent and the 'Chinese' tent but looking at the specifications they look comparable & if anything the Nature Hike appears to have better HH (water) resistance, and is 'heavier grade' material and less likely to be damaged.


So, after all that pre-amble, and considering that the existing tent is still watertight is it worth spending another £350 to save 250 grams.


Specification Comparisons


                                                 MSR Reflex 2                     NH 15T002-T-20D Silicone
Floor Area                           2.7m2                                                   2.9m2
Interior height                   860mm                                           1000mm
Flysheet Material             7 Denier 1200mm                              20 Denier 8000mm
                                                Durashield Silicon                       Duraflex Silicon
Floor                                      15 Denier Nylon                           150 Denier
                                                1200mm PU                                 8000mm
Tent                                       Mesh 10 Denier                            150 Denier + Mesh
Poles                                     Carbon Fibre                                  Aircraft Aluminium Alloy
Packed Size                         43cm x 13cm                                  40cm x 13cm
Packed Weight                  990 gram                                          1240 gram
Current Price                       £349 - £420                                    £62.99

 
Any comments or observations welcomed (I'd be quite happy if the consensus was to stick with what I have)
 
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Welsh Rambler on 21:08:01, 22/02/18
Hi Alan and welcome to the forum.


Only you can truly answer your question. If,  after a long day's hike, you are so tired that you feel you must carry less weight then the answer could be 'yes' but if could be the 250g could be saved on other kit for a lot less money.


It sounds like you are satisfied with your existing tent but would like some support to justify spending a lot more money on something you may like less.  :-\


 I am a tight old git that would start considering whether I could lose 250g of my bodyweight (which I ought to consider anyway ::) ) rather than change what appears to be a very capable tent.


Good luck with getting back to walking.


Regards Keith
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 21:22:18, 22/02/18





 I am a tight old git that would start considering whether I could lose 250g of my bodyweight (which I ought to consider anyway ::) ) rather than change what appears to be a very capable tent.


Good luck with getting back to walking.


Regards Keith


Thanks for the welcome.


I was diagnosed diabetic, overweight and with a dangerously high Cholesterol 3 years ago, I started walking again, covering 4-10 miles 5 or 6 times a week and for every pound I lost I 'added a pound weight' to my Rucksack - when, after 11 months I had 56 lbs in the sack I decided that, as an 'oldie'  it was enough and started to walk 'seriously' again carrying a reasonable weight.


I am no longer classed as diabetic, have a Cholesterol of 3.5 and feel much better.


Spent the odd nights out, but now looking to do some multi-day trips.


I am not at all unhappy with my current gear but just sort of feel its time for a bit of retail therapy.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: fernman on 22:12:47, 22/02/18
I'm with WR on this one:

could be the 250g could be saved on other kit for a lot less money.

Save your money. Go through the rest of your gear item by item and see what you can replace with something lighter. It shouldn't take much to save 250g and it'll cost you a lot less.

This is coming from someone with something in common with both of you above:
1: I'm a tight old git too, with me it goes hand-in-hand with a low income.
2. I have high cholesterol too, but unlike Alan of EN1 mine refuses to budge in spite of eating all the right things, etc (the Yorkie bars in my backpacking food list are the only times I ever eat them, honest!).
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: jimbob on 00:27:00, 23/02/18
Without knowing what knapsack you have it is very possible you could save that weight easily for a lot less money. Me I am a believer in tight fistidness. AND for that money you could get a really good down sleeping bag  which would be even more beneficial to your knees hips and back.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 07:57:45, 23/02/18

Without knowing what knapsack you have it is very possible you could save that weight easily for a lot less money. Me I am a believer in tight fistidness. AND for that money you could get a really good down sleeping bag  which would be even more beneficial to your knees hips and back.


Good point.
I have a Berghaus Trailhead 65 that weighs in at 1.7 kgs empty which for its size and strength seems to be comparable with, and lighter than, many.
Tent 'footprint' is 0.23kg.
My sleeping bag is a candidate for weight reduction being a Vango Wilderness (rated 5 / 0 / -15) and weighs 1.5kg inc stuff sack.
Self Inflating Sleeping mat weighs in at 0.99kg.


Total weight of 'cooking equipment' comes in at 1.4Kgs
(P51 Can Opener, Aluminium Foil, Lighter, Washing up Liquid, Pan Scourer, Piezo-Ignition Stove, Stove Stand / Remote Gas Adapter, Plastic Spatula, Tea-Spoon,
Titanium Saucepan & Frying Pan,  Gas Stove, 220g Colman Gas Cartridge (Will Boil ~ 13 Litres Water), Folding Wood Stove (With Paper & Kindling), 1x 'long' Lighter, Stainless Steel Bowls (2x 50g), 250ml Stainless Steel Cup, 2x Aluminium Foil 'Pans', Aluminium  Stove Wind-Break, Tea-Towel).
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: jimbob on 09:01:28, 23/02/18
Well a down sleping bag will save you at least half a kilo., probably more.

Take a really good look at all that cooking gear. Maybe a small jet boil,  titanium spork and a few wet wipes would do the same job? A spare lighter perhaps.

Personally I carry high energy bars  and eat in pubs/ cafes. Better meals than I can cook and free use of a usually decent loo. GUNWHARFMAN is to thank for this. I copied his modus , it certainly works for me.

I want the lightest load I can afford so that I can walk easily. I am prepared to put up with discomfort, well , except for cold and hunger.

Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 09:40:46, 23/02/18

Well a down sleping bag will save you at least half a kilo., probably more.

Take a really good look at all that cooking gear. Maybe a small jet boil,  titanium spork and a few wet wipes would do the same job? A spare lighter perhaps.

Personally I carry high energy bars  and eat in pubs/ cafes. Better meals than I can cook and free use of a usually decent loo. GUNWHARFMAN is to thank for this. I copied his modus , it certainly works for me.

I want the lightest load I can afford so that I can walk easily. I am prepared to put up with discomfort, well , except for cold and hunger.


Thanks for the suggestions, the key parts of my cook system are Gas Stove with piezo ignition (114g), Gas cartridge (367g) and Titanium Saucepan & frying pan (165g) and Stove 'wind break' is 13 grams.
 I guess I could ditch some of the 'bits and bobs' and save a bit.


Wet wipes are not light - a 24 'pocket pack' weighs in at 100g whilst a 64 pack weighs 512g so I think my 1/2 a tea towel (89g) and 30ml (40g) bottle of washing up liquid can remain.


I have been thru' a series of stove types including Hexamine, Alcohol/Meths, & Gel ending up with gas as the most efficient and Kw for Kw the lightest weight - I'll start another thread on my Stove selection criteria.


I do need to eat 'properly' and could easily slip back into being diabetic (you are never totally cured) so cannot rely on high sugar / carb snacks, so being able to reliably heat up water for my dehydrated Curry & Rice, Shepherds pie, etc etc is essential.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: gunwharfman on 10:10:42, 23/02/18
Lots of good advice there. I too was considering a new tent purchase and looked at Naturehike, I facied the copy of the Tarptent Rainbow 1, the Targa. I nearly bought it but then decided to go off on another way of camping, bivi and tarp.

I have a 'lightweight' Osprey 48L (I know there are a number of lighter rucksacks out there), a down sleeping quilt, a Thermarest Neo Air and can use either a Zephyros 1 (for winter) and a Marmot Pulsa 1 (for summer) so added together the weight is more than OK for me. Of course with other stuff and clothing and water the weight rises but I'm happy with my lot. I don't cook en route (I go to pubs, etc) so thats another weight saving for me.

The way I look at it, like so many others, why spend out loads of money on one very lightweight item when you can spread the lighter weight via a number of items. I would have considered a more expensive tent but I made the decision that I don't do enough camping to warrent such an outlay, I'd rather spend it on beer and good living!
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 10:54:59, 23/02/18
Thanks GWM - more food for thought.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Stube on 11:33:35, 23/02/18
There are much easier (and cheaper) ways to save weight than buying a new tent! If you like your tent then stick with it. I would avoid carbon fibre tentpoles - they are fragile - I broken them - never any problems with alloy. You can often save significant weight by simply changing the guylines and pegs.

You should be able to get a suitable 55/60 litre backpack for around 1kg - I've sourced two from charity shops! (about £7each O0 )

Your sleeping mat is heavy. Modern ultralite self-inflating mats will be half that weight full size - less if 3/4 (120cm) long.  Decathlon had a good example in their sale for £14.

Mountain Hardwear Hyperlamina or Nordisk Oscar are synthetic sleeping bags with similar performance/weight characteristics to down at half the price.

Food for thought





Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: NeilC on 13:46:54, 23/02/18
I agree - a sleeping kit weighing 2.7KG is a much better candidate than an already light tent. Although of course, if you've got the spare cash then why not do all them?


Other easy saves are using a water filter or tablets instead of carrying all the water (if the landscape allows), choice of foods (use dried if water is easily available), unneeded clothing one takes "just in case".


The key question is: what is your current pack weight?


In my personal opinion, there is a limit to weigh saving benefits. I.e. sure you can spend £££s and save grams but do your legs really notice 500g in pack weighing say 10KG incl food and water? Mine don't.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Welsh Rambler on 14:43:50, 23/02/18

Thanks for the welcome.


I was diagnosed diabetic, overweight and with a dangerously high Cholesterol 3 years ago, I started walking again, covering 4-10 miles 5 or 6 times a week and for every pound I lost I 'added a pound weight' to my Rucksack - when, after 11 months I had 56 lbs in the sack I decided that, as an 'oldie'  it was enough and started to walk 'seriously' again carrying a reasonable weight.


I am no longer classed as diabetic, have a Cholesterol of 3.5 and feel much better.


Spent the odd nights out, but now looking to do some multi-day trips.


I am not at all unhappy with my current gear but just sort of feel its time for a bit of retail therapy.


Haha, the truth is out  :D  Given what you've achieved and the significant effort needed I can understand your need for a bit of retail therapy  O0


Good luck with whatever you decide to buy but do let us know if the you like the new gear,  it's the sharing of knowledge and experience that makes this forum so successful.


Regards Keith
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Gadabout Bounder on 00:36:04, 24/02/18
Retail therapy would be changing the rucksack and sleep system.  


That's a lot of rucksack - 56 pounds is about 25 kilos - what are you carrying that weighs that much or was that till you got fit and now you've cut that weight?
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Gadabout Bounder on 00:39:29, 24/02/18
Oh and well done on the personal weight loss O0
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 10:24:50, 24/02/18

Retail therapy would be changing the rucksack and sleep system.  


That's a lot of rucksack - 56 pounds is about 25 kilos - what are you carrying that weighs that much or was that till you got fit and now you've cut that weight?


For daily fitness walks I've now dropped the weight down to 41-42 lbs, (which I am comfortable and happy carrying on the lanes and tracks around us - just enough to get a 'sweat on' and keep the body weight in line and I can maintain an average of 3.5 mpg) of which food & water is around 13lbs and there are all sorts of 'bits and bobs' thrown in to make up the weight.


 When on 'proper' multi-day hikes it is re-packed with whatever is necessary for the conditions / duration and is generally 5lbs+ lighter.


Weights are :
Rucksack : 1.7kg
Tent, Sleeping Bag, Mat, Footprint : 4.08kg
Stove, Gas Cartridge, Pots, Pans Bowls, Cup, Cutlery, Washing Up Kit : 1.42kg
Change of Clothing, Hat, Gloves, Washing Kit, Gaiters, Camp Slippers : 3.38kg
Bits & Bobs (1st Aid Kit, Trowel, Loo Paper, Radio, Kindle, Multi-Tool, Solar 'Battery Bank*' & Leads, Torch, Head Light, GPS, etc etc). :2.22kg


Total 12.8 kgs (28lbs)


*Solar Battery bank weighs 234g and will re-charge my Kindle, GPS, Watch,  Phone, Head Light, Torch & power the USB Tent Lamp
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Gadabout Bounder on 10:48:30, 24/02/18
Are you looking for a more minimalist pack weight?


My thoughts would be that if your comfortable with it that is your choice but if you can carry all of that and cut the overall weight in half or more is there any reason why you wouldn't?


The argument that to cary 12 kilos your legs don't notice I don't really agree with, try with 6 kilos and you will notice a difference at the end of a big walk or a bit of ascent, no matter who you are.


Some would say that has a bigger cost but if you are looking for retail therapy and have a couple of quid to spend I'd be all over that pack - I just wouldn't tell Mrs Bounder and any receipts for 'what this old thing, I've had it ages' would be well and truly binned.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 11:21:00, 24/02/18

Are you looking for a more minimalist pack weight?


Any weight saving has to be beneficial


My thoughts would be that if your comfortable with it that is your choice but if you can carry all of that and cut the overall weight in half or more is there any reason why you wouldn't?


None


The argument that to cary 12 kilos your legs don't notice I don't really agree with, try with 6 kilos and you will notice a difference at the end of a big walk or a bit of ascent, no matter who you are.



My 25 litre (2-3 Day sack, including tent and sleeping bag, but without food & water) comes in at 5.75kg

Some would say that has a bigger cost but if you are looking for retail therapy and have a couple of quid to spend I'd be all over that pack - I just wouldn't tell Mrs Bounder and any receipts for 'what this old thing, I've had it ages' would be well and truly binned


I am a 'Master Black Belt' in waylaying the postman / carriers. Things are becoming less difficult now SWMBO has her own Paypal account & is going wild - she purchased 5ks of nettles this week for £25.  NETTLES - NETTLES as if we don't have enough of our own !!!!!
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: fernman on 13:51:26, 24/02/18
You two have obviously married the wrong women  ;D .

I had those problems years ago when we were bringing up sprogs and I was the sole earner - you've got a rucksack, what do want another one for - but not any more. All of my income and a lot of hers (she still works, I don't) goes into a "household" account that is used for bills and food, but a fixed amount is transferred monthly to my personal account. So she doesn't see what I spend on outdoors gear and I don't see what she spends on her exotic holidays out of her own account.

The long and the short of it for me is that I could reduce my pack weight by spending hundreds of pounds on lighter tent / sleeping bag / rucksack / clothing / other bits of equipment, but I feel it would be extravagant (I said on page 1 of this thread I'm a tight old git) and anyway I don't have that amount to spend in the first place. So, I stick with what I have for now, only looking for something lighter if a replacement is essential, or if something hugely less weight comes along that is within my budget. 
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 14:29:59, 24/02/18



The long and the short of it for me is that I could reduce my pack weight by spending hundreds of pounds on lighter tent / sleeping bag / rucksack / clothing / other bits of equipment, but I feel it would be extravagant (I said on page 1 of this thread I'm a tight old git) and anyway I don't have that amount to spend in the first place. So, I stick with what I have for now, only looking for something lighter if a replacement is essential, or if something hugely less weight comes along that is within my budget.


I think in reality that is probably where I am 'at', but it always useful to 'chew the fat' and get other folks take on things - could I be doing better, is there justification for saving a few grams ?
(I'm not yet at the stage of cutting my tooth brush or comb in half, or using leaves instead of toilet paper).


I don't have any real problems with the weight (t'would be 'nicer lighter', and the day will come when it needs to be), everything 'works' I'm dry, warm, well fed and comfortable, maybe its best left as-is for now.


We may be camping but that doesn't mean we have to do without our comforts.


Its Winter time, I don't get out & about as much as I'd like, I havn't bought anything since Christmas ..................... 


Hmmmm - Looking at my boots today - treads are a bit worn down, maybe they should be next on the list.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: jimbob on 15:26:59, 24/02/18
If you are ever driven to use leaves make sure you know what a holly tree looks like and avoid them when the moment arrives.

 :D :D ;D
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: fernman on 15:51:35, 24/02/18
is there justification for saving a few grams ?
(I'm not yet at the stage of cutting my tooth brush or comb in half, or using leaves instead of toilet paper).

I left a nail file out of my kit to save 4.5g  :D   And instead of a penknife I take a Stanley craft knife with its plastic handle shortened (but TBH that's more so that it will fit inside my billy can).

I don't have any real problems with the weight (t'would be 'nicer lighter', and the day will come when it needs to be), everything 'works' I'm dry, warm, well fed and comfortable, maybe its best left as-is for now.


We may be camping but that doesn't mean we have to do without our comforts.

I couldn't have put that better.

If you are ever driven to use leaves make sure you know what a holly tree looks like and avoid them when the moment arrives.

At 16 I had a job in a shop with a skinflint manager. When the toilet paper ran out in January he put some left-over Christmas wrapping paper there for us to use. It was decorated with holly and berries, and one of the lads declared, "I'm not wiping my a***e with that, it's got prickles on it!"
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Gadabout Bounder on 20:41:14, 24/02/18
I sold 3 rucksacks on Ebay, one of them was 22 years old - an original Camelbak Mule that had not been used in over twenty years, an Osprey Talon 33 (5 years old) that wasn't quite big enough for my requirements and a Lowe Alpine 35:45 (five years old) that I thought could work for me but it didn't.


Those 3 paid for my latest rucksack.


It's more comfortable than the Osprey and Lowe Alpine but has the option of reducing it's weight if I want to and pack size is exactly what I'm after with a little wiggle room. It also has the mesh rear pocket for wet tent and or other gear. Stripped or full weight it is an incredibly comfortable purchase.


Weight reducing doesn't need to be about absolute minimum and a lack of comfort.


Pack size and purchases can be made without breaking the bank by looking at secondhand - you wouldn't know this rucksack has been used.


There is a perception that stripping weight from a rucksack is about losing comfort and some do go that way but I can assure you my pack is as comfortable as any on here but just a lot lighter.


It's taken me a long time to get where I am with my kit because I am also a tight Yorkshire lad, what I've hopefully done is bought carefully when I could afford and waited or made do until I could change kit for lighter options.


I look at every purchase from every angle, I'm [censored], I go into everything but my kit is important, it allows me to overnight in all four seasons. When I buy anything it will be months of gauging weights against comfort, brand against brand, cost is also important - the wallet isn't limitless but I don't mind paying for the right kit.


I wouldn't compromise on comfort, I'm a big lad with a very physical job/business,  Both at work and in my personal life I still push myself really hard, lower back issues & joint problems that began in my teens are showing more and more and if careful purchases can reduce problems or allow me to get out and walk a little further for as long as I can then it has been worth it.


I'd happily meet up with any members of the forum to show that lightweight doesn't mean a lack of comfort.


The aim is to get out there and enjoy it whether that is lighter or not.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Gadabout Bounder on 20:46:23, 24/02/18
Alan are you from Enfield?
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 22:23:09, 24/02/18

Alan are you from Enfield?


A regular question, but, No.
The name refers to the Lee Enfield rifles that I collect & shoot
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Dan1902 on 18:01:07, 25/02/18
With me and my gear, I find bulk worse than the weight.
I also have a Berghaus Trailhead 65 rucksack and my kit would all fit in but was so tight and proper rammed, especially now as I would take some camera gear.
This rucksack's side pockets are almost useless if you want to use them once you've already stuffed the main compartment (my biggest gripe with the thing.)
This included carrying our 3 man tent weighing in at just under 3kg (for 2 of us.) I changed to a lighter less bulky sleeping pad and a down quilt and also a down jacket (from synthetic) for when at camp or stopping for a break. This all compresses down so much better and it made a huge difference. My OH refuses to change from her synthetic fill Mountain Hardwear Lamina 20 sleeping bag but she's the one who had to carry it!
Our kit weighs in at 13-14kg give or take.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 18:51:47, 25/02/18

With me and my gear, I find bulk worse than the weight.
.
This rucksack's side pockets are almost useless if you want to use them once you've already stuffed the main compartment (my biggest gripe with the thing.)
T


Completely agree re 'Bulk' and whilst I understand what you are saying about the side pockets I have 'loads' in them


RH Side                                                                       LH Side
 1st Aid Kit + Roll Zinc-Oxide Tape                            Saucepan/Frying Pan & Contents
Cash                                                                            Stove ‘Stand’ & Adapter
Mini GPS                                                                    Gas Stove & 220g Cartridge 
Toilet Paper                                                                 Folding Steel Cup (250ml)
Wood Stove (c/w Kindling)                                        Gas Lantern + USB Bendy Light
2x Green Big Bin bags                                                2x Stainless Steel Bowls
                                                                                    Rain Hat,
                                                                                    9 Mts. Paracord


(The 1st aid kit, tablets & 'bits & bobs' are in a 1 litre ice cream tub)


The main part of the bag is 'stuffed' pretty tightly with the sleeping bag, sleeping mat, clothing and Down Jacket 'behind' the side pockets.
What I do find difficult to access / use is the little 'pockets' below the main side pockets - almost impossible to get anything out of them without emptying the big-side pockets.
 
 
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: gunwharfman on 20:53:08, 25/02/18
I often wonder what we all take when we go hiking? I couldn't even know how to fill a 65L rucksack?  I use a 48L Osprey and my previous one was 50L, even when fully equiped for a 2 or 3 weeker I would still have, what I think is a fair amount of space left. I do not cook en route and do not carry a camera so these items are not taking up space in my rucksack. I do have stuff in the outside pockets and they cause me no problems, they are nicely flexible and elastic. I just use them to hold my 3 fold sit on mat, a pair of flip flops, my groundsheet, my rucksack cover and water filter. I roll my tent and tent poles up like a sausage and then horizontally secure them across the top of the rucksack. My waist belt has a smallish pocket on each side of my waist band. I carry my coins and MIFi in one and the other is used to carry my phone charging wires and my little back-up flip Samsung phone, £9.99 from Tesco's, one of my better buys. My down sleeping quilt, in its stuffsack, really compresses into a small size as does my NeoAit mattress. As I write this I am still thinking, if I had one, how would I cope with a 65L Rucksack?
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Gadabout Bounder on 21:49:16, 25/02/18
I'm glad Alan mentioned the ice cream container - It made me go and check how big it was - when I went in the freezer there was a 900 mil container with some triple choc left in it.


It was lovely O0
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 22:14:42, 25/02/18

. I roll my tent and tent poles up like a sausage and then horizontally secure them across the top of the rucksack.


Well I wonder what 'size' (number of litres) your tent, poles etc would add up to.
I was always taught to have everything 'packed' inside your pack - nothing outside to rattle, bang, or able to 'catch' or snag on anything.


If your tent, poles etc. pack into (just as an example) a 40cm x 15cm diameter 'sausage' that is equivalent to 7.1 litres.


If (for example) you have a down 'quilt' that may pack down into 5 litres, my Vango Wilderness sleeping bag packs down into 9.1 litres.


Just with those two items we have identified a 16.2 litres difference - as has been said earlier in the thread, 'bulk' (volume) can be as important as weight.[/color]  

My tent is 6.75 litres, the mattress is 5.5 litres, and sleeping bag at 9.1 litres thats 21.5 litres
Add change of clothing, Poncho, woolly hat, gloves, camp-slippers, washing kit, gaiters, headlamp, radio, GPS,  5 days food*, 2 litres of water, cooking equipment, solar battery charger, large 1st aid kit assorted bits & pieces and it all mounts up in volume.


* Yes - 5 days food is excessive but because of my diabetes I need to ensure that should anything happen, I have sufficient food to maintain a reasonable diet for a couple of 'emergency days' - I cannot rely on just Mars bars and Mint cake. If I am going for 1 day/ night I would take 3 days food, if going for 3 days/nights I'd take 5 days food. My 2-Day ration box weighs in at 1.2kgs, provides 2000Kcal per day and takes up 2 litres of space.




We all make choices, and by doing things 'your way' you are happy and able to use a 48 litre bag, my choice of contents results in requiring a 65 litre pack.
I have my 25 litre pack, ready and packed for 2 day/night trips but it would not offer the comfort levels of camping I get from the 'stuff' in my 'big-bag'.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 22:18:42, 25/02/18

I'm glad Alan mentioned the ice cream container - It made me go and check how big it was - when I went in the freezer there was a 900 mil container with some triple choc left in it.


It was lovely O0


It wasn't the stuff from Aldi was it ?
Lovely it is - very naughty, but I will occasionally scrape out the tub when the family have had the rest.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Gadabout Bounder on 22:26:30, 25/02/18
Yes it was - the rules go out of the door with icecream - there's no sharing with me.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: gunwharfman on 10:33:30, 26/02/18
I'm never keen to put anything wet into my rucksack, especially my tent which is wet most mornings, either due to rain or dew. My usual routine is after a couple of hours hiking, when the sun is properly out and I fancy a rest, is to just unroll my tent and lay it on the grass for a good dryout. It drys quickly so when ready I roll it up again, put it into its sausage bag, secure and be on my way. I carry a plastic container, I bought it in Hobbycraft, it fits perfectly in my Osprey top bag, great for my nuts, chocky bars and so on.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: NeilC on 17:02:19, 28/02/18
I often wonder what we all take when we go hiking? I couldn't even know how to fill a 65L rucksack?


Carry everything in it, not strapped to the top and have a bulky sleeping bag and tent - and that's your extra litres made up easy
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: KimE on 07:12:50, 03/03/18

[font=]I wouldn`t feel comfortable with a 7Denier flysheet on a tent save your money.
[font=]
 
[font=]
 
[font=]
 
[font=]Tent 'footprint' is 0.23kg.  
[font=]
 
[font=]Do you need a footprint? [font=]
[font=&amp]
[font=]My sleeping bag is a candidate for weight reduction being a Vango Wilderness (rated 5 / 0 / -15) and weighs 1.5kg inc stuff sack.
[font=]
 
[font=]Mine -1c sleeping bag weights 0,81kg
[font=&amp]
[font=]Self Inflating Sleeping mat weighs in at 0.99kg.
[font=]
 
[font=]My sleeping mat weights 0,45kg
[font=&amp]
[font=&amp]
[font=]Total weight of 'cooking equipment' comes in at 1.4Kgs
[font=]
 
[font=]Mine gasstove with cup/kåsa and spork weights 0,4kg add a gas canister 400g, waterbottle 20g.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Troggy on 23:15:29, 21/03/18
Hello Alan,
What a good discussion you've started!
Is the Naturhike tent the 2 man, front entrance one, or is it a side entrance tent? Anyway, I to have been looking at tents (as if I ain't got enough already!) but I think the retail therapy temptation is a hard one to resist, it is  for me anyway!
 
A naturehike tent was featured by a fellow member and he seems very pleased with the result, so I'm tempted to try one. I've got an oldish Tarptent Double Rainbow that I bought off ebay that I've sewn in lightweight nylon panels over the mesh. A bit Heath Robinson and I'll be giving it a try when the weather relents and see if it works.

If it does, then I've got a tent that weighs around 1.6kg with plenty of room and two doorways, four doors, which is the style of tent I prefer.

I put myself also in the "rather careful with my dosh" category; but I'm also tempted in the winter by whats on ebay! Hence the collection of tents and rucksacks! As some of our members are really long distance walking, then I think they would always be looking to keep their kit as lightweight as they can get it; and making their own gear.

I remember reading an article by Showell Styles who, at 70, walked the Owain Glyndwr Way and the title was "Over 70, under 20" and he had a kit, including food, which weighed just under 20lbs. Fantastic really, considering the advances there have been since the mid eighties on kit materials. If I can find it, I'll print on here.

As for me, I fully intend to be a lightweight camper before setting off on any adventure...but always end up carrying the kitchen sink!
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 23:51:35, 21/03/18

Hello Alan,
What a good discussion you've started!
Is the Naturhike tent the 2 man, front entrance one, or is it a side entrance tent? Anyway, I to have been looking at tents (as if I ain't got enough already!) but I think the retail therapy temptation is a hard one to resist, it is  for me anyway!



I have the 2-man 'front-loader' which I think has been renamed to "Cloud Up Ultralight", It is 1.6kg all in (inc the footprint) Mine is a 'greeny' colour and has 8000HH water resistance (The latest ones are 4000HH)
If you are interested in this one at 'the right price' drop me a message.


(https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/FPsAAOSwHgdasWVL/s-l1600.jpg)
(https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/zGkAAOSwjpRasWVN/s-l1600.jpg)



But the one I have just purchased is a 'Side-loader' and is a copy of the MSR Hubba Hubba NX and is manufactured / supplied by 'WolfWise' (rather than NatureHike). All in weight 1.8ks without footprint


It has full sitting height inside (1 metre). I have gone for the 'green' version


(https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/bicAAOSwPXBakmyC/s-l1600.png)
(https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/XxYAAOSwHrVakmyG/s-l1600.png)


Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Troggy on 11:13:43, 22/03/18
I thought it might be the one with the doors at the front and I saw that said tent being reviewed by a feller on Youtube. It is a lot of tent for the money but I would only buy a transverse ridge one, as I find it a hell of a contortion to try and get out of a front door tent, whereas the "sideloader" you mention, I find a lot more comfortable to get in and out of.. and to lie there and make a nice brew.

I've looked at the Naturehike "Star River" 2 man tent and it looks excellent, except for all that mesh. Thats why I decided not to get one; and have a go at sewing in the panels of my "Double Rainbow...and see how I get on with that. The Double Rainbow has excellent dimensions, both for the internal space a the porches.

Internal Height 43" or 109 cm, Width 52"/132cm, length 244cm, or just on 8ft. Porches 8ft and 1ft 8"/50cms wide (might be a bit wider than that) so it's got a lot of good points. The only real thing I'd like different is that it was a nice dark green instead of a ghostly grey!

I'll be giving it a try outafter easter and see how it goes.

Thanks for the thought about the naturehike and the details. I might well be after one if my experiment fails!

Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: gunwharfman on 11:27:10, 22/03/18
I've reached an age now where I couldn't live with a front entrance tent. All of the tents I've owned are side entrances, for me so much easier. Have you looked at the Cinch tent on www.kickstarter.com, the way forward perhaps?
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: jimbob on 11:48:04, 22/03/18
At 5Kg, no way. The Cinch tent may be OK for car campers but carrying that weight on top of everything else puts it in the unfeasible bin for backpackers.

P.S. how you getting on with your bivvi? I'm thinking seriously of the DD super light pyramid tent, since I could not use my coffin tent fly only.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Troggy on 13:18:33, 22/03/18
Too right Gunwharfman, I had a Saunders Lite Hike donkeys years ago, and even then I enjoyed how light it was but just staring up at the light blue roof was enough for me, then trying to get out in the night decided me...no more front door tents! I got a Caravan Kaipak in the mid eighties, which was about 2.4kg but was brilliant for it's space, height and 4 doors. The Double Rainbow is similar but about half the weight.

I've also got a Coleman Novae 2, which is out of production now but I got it off Ebay (another sodding tent!) but it looks unused, it's a side opener, has two doorways (one on each side, and looks a decent tent. It's got bags of room width wise but is only 90 cms high. Still, it's decent weight for a 2 man tent at 1.9kg all in and I'll have a go at it should the D/R experiment not work.

I had a look at the Cinch; but I once tried to "un-pop" a pop up tent and made a miserable failure of it! For car camping I've got an Ozark trail 4 man tent that weighs 5kg and bought it at a car bootie for a fiver. It's been brilliant so far. Its olive green, has a massive porch and is side opening, mesh and solid inner doors with windows in the sides of the porch that have their own covers.

I liked the look of the MSR Hubba Hubba HP with the more solid inner but just thought it was more than I would want to pay for a tent.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Troggy on 15:34:22, 24/03/18
Alan, I'll be selling a Cumulus Quantum (780gms) in excellent nick, that might suit you. Check out one or two reviews if it might be of interest.
I think I mentioned somewhere that Showell Styles wrote an account in the mid 80's,  of his walk acroos Glyndwr's Way when he was over 70.
The title was Seventy Plus, Twenty Minus. I'll have to precis it a bit as I ran out of time trying top do the total contents,

Rucksack (Cheapo cobmaster, no frame but he got some light bamboo rods and made one)   1lb 06oz                                              Wash kit                    12oz
Tent 40odd year old Blacks Good Companions Minor                                                                 4lb 01oz                                              knife, spoon
Sleeping Bag                                                                                                                               3lb 06oz                                             Mug  Bowl +
Surfrider (childrens Li Lo)                                                                                                                   09oz                                            candler holder             08oz 
Stove  (Bluet 200+Gas cartridge)                                                                                                 1lb 08oz                                            F/A, Compass, Map
Pyjamas                                                                                                                                             13oz                                            Notebook &Pencil         11oz
Sweater                                                                                                                                              07oz                                            Tissues                         02oz
Towel                                                                                                                                                  03oz                                            Food and Drink
Wind/waterproofs (Anorak and Trousers)                                                                                          12oz                                            Bread                            08oz
                                                                                                                                                                                                               Sugar                            08oz
                                                                                                                                                                                                               4 Eggs                           11oz
                                                                                                                                                                                                               Cheese, Butter               04oz ea
Then finished off with another 1lb  6oz of tea marmalade, Biscuits teabags, seets

He'd relenish on the way and he reckoned the Bluet 200 lasted him the week. He also had a couple of pints and the occasional meal, if he came across a wayside hostelry (a truer knight of the highways and byways) The whole lot came to 19lb  13oz
It's a fascinating insight into the "lightweight Camper" of 30 odd years ago
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Troggy on 15:48:15, 24/03/18
Ps, I had to shorten the list as I was running out of time but he reckoned that the Bluet Stove boiled all his soups, eggs and teas on the journey, which totalled 13 brews and he tested the stove when he got back home and it did another half dozen boil ups. Good old Bluet 200...still got my old one of them...come to think of it, I've still got my Good Companions from 1970 and I might have a go at giving it a try out.
He had no spare socks or footwear but reckoned he'd get by with a walk lasting over 6 nights.
He was a great character and I think his book, "The Campers and Trampers Week-End book was the one that set me off with a love of camping. All I need now is to practice a bit of what he did, and cut the weight of my gear down...drastically!
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 16:27:12, 24/03/18

Alan, I'll be selling a Cumulus Quantum (780gms) in excellent nick, that might suit you. Check out one or two reviews if it might be of interest.



Thanks for the offer but I went for the Chinese copy of the MSR Hubba Hubba NX2 and due to 'circumstances;' ended up with 2 for £74.99 (the MSR version being £300-£400 (for one)
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Troggy on 17:03:01, 24/03/18
Yeh! Excellent! Isn't it great when you get a bargain even more of a bargain than you expected. No botherr, about the bag, it'll be going on ebay when IO can get round to putting it on. Let me kow if you wish to sell the spare one.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: FOX160 on 20:44:12, 10/05/18

For daily fitness walks I've now dropped the weight down to 41-42 lbs, (which I am comfortable and happy carrying on the lanes and tracks around us - just enough to get a 'sweat on' and keep the body weight in line and I can maintain an average of 3.5 mpg) of which food & water is around 13lbs and there are all sorts of 'bits and bobs' thrown in to make up the weight.


 When on 'proper' multi-day hikes it is re-packed with whatever is necessary for the conditions / duration and is generally 5lbs+ lighter.


Weights are :
Rucksack : 1.7kg
Tent, Sleeping Bag, Mat, Footprint : 4.08kg
Stove, Gas Cartridge, Pots, Pans Bowls, Cup, Cutlery, Washing Up Kit : 1.42kg
Change of Clothing, Hat, Gloves, Washing Kit, Gaiters, Camp Slippers : 3.38kg
Bits & Bobs (1st Aid Kit, Trowel, Loo Paper, Radio, Kindle, Multi-Tool, Solar 'Battery Bank*' & Leads, Torch, Head Light, GPS, etc etc). :2.22kg


Total 12.8 kgs (28lbs)


*Solar Battery bank weighs 234g and will re-charge my Kindle, GPS, Watch,  Phone, Head Light, Torch & power the USB Tent Lamp


Wow that’s a lot of unnecessary weight your carrying! Is your kit for 3/4season use?
Change your pack last. Do you actually need a Two person tent! Your cookset is very heavy, what’s your cooking preference? Sleep system is heavy too, and what is your budget? You can always buy good second hand products from people whom are dropping their pack weight too.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 21:13:10, 10/05/18


Wow that’s a lot of unnecessary weight your carrying! Is your kit for 3/4season use?
Change your pack last. Do you actually need a Two person tent! Your cookset is very heavy, what’s your cooking preference? Sleep system is heavy too, and what is your budget? You can always buy good second hand products from people whom are dropping their pack weight too.


Since the original post I have reduced the weight of those items quoted by 1.6kg (down to 10.6kgs)


The cooking 'system' comprises of :
Titanium pot and frying pan = 165g
Gas Cannister (220g gas) = 367g
Gas Stove, Stand and Windbreak = 291g
Porridge Bowl = 50g
300ml insulated Mug = 112g
T-Towel = 26g
Can Opener / Washing Up Liquid / Pan Scourer / Tea Spoon = 48g
Back Up wood / Twig Stove = 147g.


I have an alternative Titanium Stove at 50g but it is less stable than the one with a built in stand and hose connection to the gas cartridge as the lightweight one screws directly onto the top of the gas cartridge. (So I could drop out another 200+ grams).


If I was overly worried about the pack weight I could also leave out the Wood stove (147g)


I have reduced the 'sleep system' weight (and bulk) by going for a new down 3-season sleeping bag (now 860g was previously 1600g) and a lighter weight sleep mat (now 460g was previously 990g)


I have reduced the 'clothing weight' by 500g by replacing winter clothes, ( plus gloves and 'wooly hat') with lightweight Summer clothes.


Tent - yes. Whilst I don't need a 2-man tent I am not a small person and enjoy the length, width and additional 'seating' height. My 1-man tent with footprint weighs in at 1800g, my 2-man with footprint weighs 2030g. I am happy to carry 200g for the additional comfort and space.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: marmottungsten on 02:55:27, 18/05/18

Good point.
I have a Berghaus Trailhead 65 that weighs in at 1.7 kgs empty which for its size and strength seems to be comparable with, and lighter than, many.
Tent 'footprint' is 0.23kg.
My sleeping bag is a candidate for weight reduction being a Vango Wilderness (rated 5 / 0 / -15) and weighs 1.5kg inc stuff sack.
Self Inflating Sleeping mat weighs in at 0.99kg.


Total weight of 'cooking equipment' comes in at 1.4Kgs
(P51 Can Opener, Aluminium Foil, Lighter, Washing up Liquid, Pan Scourer, Piezo-Ignition Stove, Stove Stand / Remote Gas Adapter, Plastic Spatula, Tea-Spoon,
Titanium Saucepan & Frying Pan,  Gas Stove, 220g Colman Gas Cartridge (Will Boil ~ 13 Litres Water), Folding Wood Stove (With Paper & Kindling), 1x 'long' Lighter, Stainless Steel Bowls (2x 50g), 250ml Stainless Steel Cup, 2x Aluminium Foil 'Pans', Aluminium  Stove Wind-Break, Tea-Towel).
Alan, firstly I have to say that you are carrying way too much superfluous gear...Most of that kit won't be used, or it's too heavy and elaborate, so it would be better left at home, reducing both weight and the volume of the backpack you need to carry it all in, which in turn will save even more weight.  Your Berghaus 65 litre rucksack is very heavy and bulky...If you really want a backpack of that size, then there are several backpacks out there, of similar capacity that are around half the weight.  For instance, the $325, 64 litre Zpacks Arc Haul Zip, which at 780g, is less than half the weight of your Berghaus.  However, if you use ultralight gear which can be packed smaller, allowing you to use a slightly smaller backpack, you could get away with something like a $325, 55 litre Zpacks Arc Blast instead, which weighs just £595g, a massive 1.105kg lighter than your Berghaus! 
Your sleeping bag is very heavy too...A £320 Marmot Phase 30 Down sleeping bag, has the same comfort rating as your Vango but it's only 500g...3 times lighter than your Vango!   
Self inflating mats like yours are very heavy too, offer little in the way of comfort and do not pack down very small...A £69.99 Kylmit Inertia X-Frame Regular would be far more comfortable, packs down to the size of a Coke can, inflates quicker (only takes 3-4 breaths, then you use the included micro pump to increase the firmness if required) and weighs just 241g, almost 750g lighter than your self inflating mat!  So as you can see, just by swapping 3 items for ultralight versions you can save several kilos off your base weight, but, with the exception of the X-Frame, they can also cost you a lot of money.  So as always, it costs money to lose weight!
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: April on 07:03:16, 18/05/18
Self inflating mats like yours are very heavy too, offer little in the way of comfort and do not pack down small...A Kylmit Inertia X-Frame would be far more comfortable, packs down to the size of a Coke can and weighs just 241g,

Far more comfortable?

I looked at the Klymit a few years ago intrigued by its light weight and pack size but didn't think it would be suitable for me, here is a review of the mat by Outdoorgearlab. I would rather carry more weight and have a more comfy night. Just because you find it comfortable it wouldn't be comfortable for everyone.

https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/reviews/camping-and-hiking/sleeping-pad/klymit-inertia-x-frame

In my experience, marmottungsten the lightest weight item isn't always the best option, for instance, we now carry a heavier tent because it is warmer and less draughty in the sometimes cold and breezy conditions on the Lake District hills. People can carry what they want to take when they go out camping or bakcpacking, it may be too heavy for you to carry perhaps but I know people who take a lot more gear than alan. What you take with you is a personal choice, what is unnecessary to one person is essential for someone else.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: beefy on 07:32:32, 18/05/18
Your Berghaus 65 litre rucksack is very heavy and bulky...If you really want a backpack of that size, then there are several backpacks out there, of similar capacity that are around half the weight. For instance, the 64 litre Zpacks Arc Haul Zip, which at 780g, is less than half the weight, but use ultralight gear, which can be packed smaller, allowing you to use a smaller backpack, like a 55 litre Zpacks Arc Blast which weighs just £595g, 1.105kg lighter than your Berghaus!  Your sleeping bag is very heavy too...A Marmot Phase 30 Down sleeping bag, has the 8same comfort rating as your Vango but it's 3 times lighter!   Self inflating mats like yours are very heavy too, offer little in the way of comfort and do not pack down small...A Kylmit Inertia X-Frame would be far more comfortable, packs down to the size of a Coke can and weighs just 241g, almost 750g lighter than your self inflating mat!  By choosing these ultralight options you can easiily save several kilos. As you might suspect, some of these options are quite expensive, so if are serious about saving serious amounts of weight, i'm afraid it's going to cost you serious amounts of money!
Some very valid points there from April :)
Have you seen the price of Zpacks gear  :o
Are they Cuban fibre, and how durable are they,
Isn't  This fabric easily punctured?
Save yourself some weight, and a shed load of money
And rip off import tax, etc. And buy an osprey Exos pack,
I can highly recommend them,
They are light, durable, and worth the money,
I find mine very comfortable,
As for the sleeping bag, I use a Vango down 5 degree bag which cost about £60
Weighs 650g and packs down really small,
And the Klymit,
I wouldn't  Even give it to the dog to sleep on,
Saving weight is one thing, sacrificing comfort and a good night's
 Sleep is another

 

 

Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 08:24:18, 18/05/18


quote author=marmottungsten link=topic=36044.msg519641#msg519641 date=1526608527]
Alan, firstly I have to say that you are carrying way too much superfluous gear...Most of that kit won't be used and can be left at home, reducing both weight and the volume of the backpack you need to carry it all in, which in turn will save even more weight.  Your Berghaus 65 litre rucksack is very heavy and bulky...If you really want a backpack of that size, then there are several backpacks out there, of similar capacity that are around half the weight. For instance, the 64 litre Zpacks Arc Haul Zip, which at 780g, is less than half the weight, but use ultralight gear, which can be packed smaller, allowing you to use a smaller backpack, like a 55 litre Zpacks Arc Blast which weighs just £595g, 1.105kg lighter than your Berghaus!  Your sleeping bag is very heavy too...A Marmot Phase 30 Down sleeping bag, has the same comfort rating as your Vango but it's 3 times lighter!   Self inflating mats like yours are very heavy too, offer little in the way of comfort and do not pack down small...A Kylmit Inertia X-Frame would be far more comfortable, packs down to the size of a Coke can and weighs just 241g, almost 750g lighter than your self inflating mat!  By choosing these ultralight options you can easiily save several kilos. As you might suspect, some of these options are quite expensive, so if are serious about saving serious amounts of weight, i'm afraid it's going to cost you serious amounts of money!



Thank you for taking the time to reply but you seem to have missed my latest post (it was immediately before your post) where you will see I have replaced some gear (sleeping bag down by 50% and sleep mat down by 50%).
I have looked at the X-Frame but being a 'side sleeper' it is totally and utterly useless - being just a 'string of sausage balloons tied together at random points' give no support at all.
Having read various reviews of it your recommendation appears to be unique - are you a Marmot / Klymit employee ?
Even users reviews on the Klymit website use it with an extra foam pad (there goes any weight & bulk saving).


Being 6 foot, a 'side sleeper' fairly 'wide and heavy' (93kgs) I unfortunately fail to meet any of the criteria for use of the X-Frame.


(https://outdoorgearlab-mvnab3pwrvp3t0.stackpathdns.com/photos/13/85/259983_26898_L.jpg)


Although the X Frame is impressively lightweight and compact, it has several drawbacks that restrict its use to a specific group of people.
1) The pad's air baffles are "body mapped" to fit someone about 5' 10" in height. Depending on how your body parts match up to it, the pad may not fit you. The pad is also the narrowest of the 20 we tested — it's 18" wide as opposed to the standard 20" width. Thus, wider people may not fit on it.
2) The pad is ideal for people who sleep on their backs and don't thrash about at night. You may not find the Inertia X Frame to be comfortable if you turn over frequently, sleep on your side, or curl excessively.
3) The pad's thin baffles and large open spaces do a poor job at insulating you from the ground below; the pad is best for summer use.

In sum, the Inertia X Frame could be a good choice for summer backpacking if you're around 5' 10" and sleep on your back.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: marmottungsten on 11:39:29, 18/05/18

quote author=marmottungsten link=topic=36044.msg519641#msg519641 date=1526608527]
Alan, firstly I have to say that you are carrying way too much superfluous gear...Most of that kit won't be used and can be left at home, reducing both weight and the volume of the backpack you need to carry it all in, which in turn will save even more weight.  Your Berghaus 65 litre rucksack is very heavy and bulky...If you really want a backpack of that size, then there are several backpacks out there, of similar capacity that are around half the weight. For instance, the 64 litre Zpacks Arc Haul Zip, which at 780g, is less than half the weight, but use ultralight gear, which can be packed smaller, allowing you to use a smaller backpack, like a 55 litre Zpacks Arc Blast which weighs just £595g, 1.105kg lighter than your Berghaus!  Your sleeping bag is very heavy too...A Marmot Phase 30 Down sleeping bag, has the same comfort rating as your Vango but it's 3 times lighter!   Self inflating mats like yours are very heavy too, offer little in the way of comfort and do not pack down small...A Kylmit Inertia X-Frame would be far more comfortable, packs down to the size of a Coke can and weighs just 241g, almost 750g lighter than your self inflating mat!  By choosing these ultralight options you can easiily save several kilos. As you might suspect, some of these options are quite expensive, so if are serious about saving serious amounts of weight, i'm afraid it's going to cost you serious amounts of money!



Thank you for taking the time to reply but you seem to have missed my latest post (it was immediately before your post) where you will see I have replaced some gear (sleeping bag down by 50% and sleep mat down by 50%).
I have looked at the X-Frame but being a 'side sleeper' it is totally and utterly useless - being just a 'string of sausage balloons tied together at random points' give no support at all.
Having read various reviews of it your recommendation appears to be unique - are you a Marmot / Klymit employee ?
Even users reviews on the Klymit website use it with an extra foam pad (there goes any weight & bulk saving).


Being 6 foot, a 'side sleeper' fairly 'wide and heavy' (93kgs) I unfortunately fail to meet any of the criteria for use of the X-Frame.


(https://outdoorgearlab-mvnab3pwrvp3t0.stackpathdns.com/photos/13/85/259983_26898_L.jpg)


Although the X Frame is impressively lightweight and compact, it has several drawbacks that restrict its use to a specific group of people.
1) The pad's air baffles are "body mapped" to fit someone about 5' 10" in height. Depending on how your body parts match up to it, the pad may not fit you. The pad is also the narrowest of the 20 we tested — it's 18" wide as opposed to the standard 20" width. Thus, wider people may not fit on it.
2) The pad is ideal for people who sleep on their backs and don't thrash about at night. You may not find the Inertia X Frame to be comfortable if you turn over frequently, sleep on your side, or curl excessively.
3) The pad's thin baffles and large open spaces do a poor job at insulating you from the ground below; the pad is best for summer use.

In sum, the Inertia X Frame could be a good choice for summer backpacking if you're around 5' 10" and sleep on your back.


Just so you know, I don't work for Marmot or Klymit, I just use their equipment which I chose carefully after much research into ultralight gear. 
I am also a side sleeper, and I genuinely find the X-Frame very comfortable, so unless you have actually used one for yourself I wouldn't believe one negative review.
I should also mention that I use the X-Frame Recon, not the normal X-Frame.  The Recon comes in a much lower visibility Coyote/Sand colour (much better for steath camping), and its far more durable because unlike the normal X-Frame, which is 75D material on the bottom and 45D material on the top, the Recon is 75D material on both sides...Effectively making it double sided, which is another bonus because if one side gets dirty, you still have a clean side to sleep on.  It is a little heavier of course (about 292g) but that still makes it 48g lighter than a Neoair Xlite, and far more durable, because the Xlite is only 30D material top and bottom!  And yet another bonus is it does not make a load of noise when you move on it, in fact, it's virtually silent, unlike the racket you get from a Neoair if you so much as twitch on it during the night!
I have to stress that the X-Frame must be used INSIDE your sleeping bag, not under it.  This allows your sleeping bags down to loft up into the cut outs ("loft pockets", as Klymit calls them), which greatly increases the insulation below you.  Lying on any other sleeping mat, like a Neoair, compresses the down under you, greatly reducing the insulation below you, so the X-Frame is far warmer to sleep on than it looks.  Also, your body heat isn't constantly being lost to a cold sleeping mat underneath your sleeping bag...Inside your sleeping bag, the air inside the X-Frame heats up and is kept warm by the greater loft in the down below you, keeping you cosy and warm.  It may look wierd, but it works!
I also use Klymits Pillow-X Recon.  The clever self-centering action of it's design means your head has a better chance of staying on the pillow, even when you twist and turn in the night, and it gives handy clearance space for your ears when sleeping on your side, so your earplug has a better chance of staying in your ear overnight...Which can help you avoid being woken up by the damn dawn chorus!
Again, it a bit heavier than the normal Pillow-X because its 75D material both sides, instead of 75D material on the bottom and 30D material on the top.  It weighs 63.8g and it packs down to something not much bigger than a Bic lighter.  Conveniently, it packs down small enough to fit inside the X-Frame Recon storage pouch along with the X-Frame recon itself.  And this pouch then fit's inside an ultralight Trekmates 5 litre compression bag, along with my Marmot Phase 30 sleeping bag, my Berghaus 75% Merino wool socks and my Technicals 50% Merino wool, long sleeved top and trousers, thermal underwear...Which is all I wear inside my Phase 30 at night.  By the way, a little tip...I also place an ultralight space blanket on the floor of my tent, to reflect my body heat back upwards, and my sleeping bag goes directly on top of of that...It is about twice the width of my tents sleeping area so I can conveniently wrap the other half of the space blanket over my sleeping bag, keeping me even warmer.  :)
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: gunwharfman on 11:48:48, 18/05/18
I've always found it easy to make mistakes with equipment, I'm now on my 3rd rucksack. I'm now happy with what I've got and will not be buying another. I'm also on my 3rd Thermarest, my original is great to sleep on but a bit bulky, I now use it in the house for me to sleep on when we have visitors. I prefer to be downstairs because I am always the first one up and doing in the mornings. I also have a thin Thermarest which I use in my Bivi, which rolls up very nicely to carry, but its drawback is that I have to be so precise with its pressure, too little and my hip becomes painful, too much and its like sleeping on a brick. I'm very happy with my Neo Air, expensive but so comfortable and so easy to roll into a small pack.

I like my Pulsar 1 tent but I need to replace it because four of the poles have snapped (a teenager fell on it, or was pushed) and I can't get new one. I also have a Zepyros 1, which is best for the winter, this I think is a strong tent.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: marmottungsten on 11:57:15, 18/05/18
I've always found it easy to make mistakes with equipment, I'm now on my 3rd rucksack. I'm now happy with what I've got and will not be buying another. I'm also on my 3rd Thermarest, my original is great to sleep on but a bit bulky, I now use it in the house for me to sleep on when we have visitors. I prefer to be downstairs because I am always the first one up and doing in the mornings. I also have a thin Thermarest which I use in my Bivi, which rolls up very nicely to carry, but its drawback is that I have to be so precise with its pressure, too little and my hip becomes painful, too much and its like sleeping on a brick. I'm very happy with my Neo Air, expensive but so comfortable and so easy to roll into a small pack.

I like my Pulsar 1 tent but I need to replace it because four of the poles have snapped (a teenager fell on it, or was pushed) and I can't get new one. I also have a Zepyros 1, which is best for the winter, this I think is a strong tent.


Have you tried ringing Marmot to see if they have replacement poles for your Pulsar in stock?  I went to their website and found this, among the commonly asked questions: "Can I order replacement parts (buckles, pole parts, zipper pulls, etc.) through Marmot?" "Certainly! Marmot’s Warranty department carries an assortment of parts and pieces for replacement. To find out what we have in stock, please give us a call at (888) 311-2900, Monday through Friday from 7:30am - 5:00pm (PST)."
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: gunwharfman on 12:42:39, 18/05/18
I tried Marmot UK and Marmot USA, they could not help me. I even sent my broken poles to a couple of other firms but again nothing. In the meantime I've managed to bodge them together with sticky tape and the tent is now OK again, but I always know now that I am in a defective tent. I did this some months ago but thanks to your information I might try again.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Rajboy on 12:42:50, 18/05/18
Don't cook just boil water and add to.....whatever......look forward to a real meal when you get home.
It will save extra weight of fuel/gas canister.
Trail Designs set up, if you can justify importing
OR....buy local in UK.....Speedster stove, stand and windshield...meths system.
Smaller pot max 600ml.
Takes up much less space in pack and weight is minimal......
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: marmottungsten on 21:53:23, 18/05/18
I tried Marmot UK and Marmot USA, they could not help me. I even sent my broken poles to a couple of other firms but again nothing. In the meantime I've managed to bodge them together with sticky tape and the tent is now OK again, but I always know now that I am in a defective tent. I did this some months ago but thanks to your information I might try again.


Do you have a means to accurately measure the inner diameter of your poles like a cheap digital vernier caliper for instance? If your poles have snapped then you just need to join the broken bits together with some 2-3" lengths of tube that are a slightly tight or "snug fit" inside them.  But you will need to know the exact inner diameter of your broken tubes, so you can go to your local Aluminium or non-ferrous metals stockist and get the right size tube to make joiner sections from. Stainless steel would work great but you can save a little weight by using 7000 series Duralumin tube (Aircraft grade) instead. Once you have your joiner sections cut and deburred, use a fine permanent marker, like a sharpie, to draw a straight line along one side of each tube section, and mark a line across where the middle is. Then measure 2cm back from the middle line towards one end and mark another line across at this point (we will call this point X).  Use a hole punch to leave a dimple at point X then using a drill and a 4-5mm drill bit (it's easier with a drill stand but with care it can be done by hand) start drilling into the dimple at point X, but don't drill right through (the idea is to leave a little crater in the tube).   Then slide half of this tube section into one end of your broken tube till the middle line meets the end of the broken tube.  Measure 2cm back from the middle and mark a line across on the outer broken tube, making sure it lines up with the longitudal line you drew earlier.  Place your broken tube with the joiner section inside, on a flat, hard, solid surface, use a hammer and your your hole punch to form a dent in the the outer broken tube...If you have measured everything accurately then this dent will fill the crater you left in the joiner section inside, forming a neat, flush, strong and permanent joint...You only need to do this at one end of each joiner tube if your inner shock cord can be re threaded through as it will hold the sections together by elastic tension, just as with new poles, or if you prefer, simply repeat the process for the other end of each joiner tube, which will ensure the original tube lengths are maintained.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Stube on 11:24:02, 21/05/18
It's a myth that self-inflating mats are heavy.

I have three 3/4 length mats and all weigh less than 300g. Few inflatable mats will match that. Their big advantage is that they will provide some insulation and comfort even when punctured.

The reason self-inflaters can be lightweight is the structural strength provided by the foam enabling lighter weight covering fabrics.

They don't pack as small as the lightest airbed typically about 1.5 litres, but I prefer to use them folded as backpadding for my rucksacks.

The no longer made Karrimor mat is the lightest but delaminated after seven years use , one from a Decathlon sale this year is the heaviest and cheapest at £15, the Multimat is still available for less than £40.




Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Jim Parkin on 19:49:21, 31/05/18
At 5Kg, no way. The Cinch tent may be OK for car campers but carrying that weight on top of everything else puts it in the unfeasible bin for backpackers.

P.S. how you getting on with your bivvi? I'm thinking seriously of the DD super light pyramid tent, since I could not use my coffin tent fly only.
Bit late to this discussion, but I have gone to a pyramid tent (after a Vnago Banshee), mainly because I wanted something I could sit up in.  Since getting it (Lux Hexpeak), I've realised that unlike the Vango, I can raise the pole if I want more breeze... It's possible to raise it high enough to crawl under the flysheet - good for hot weather or airing the tent in the morning.  It isn't very warm in winter though - most of the inner is mesh, just enough fabric to be higher than me when lying down, so drafts are reduced when sleeping. 
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: jimbob on 00:46:51, 01/06/18
Thanks for this Jim. Was beginning to think that pyramid  tents were a no go area.   I have decided to stick with my little coffin tent as it has been so easy to deal with and has proven totally water proof to date and also is quite light just on the 1kilo mark. Also I am a tight wad and do not want to take a risk on something I cannot see in an outdoor shop.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Doddy on 17:33:37, 01/06/18
+1 for the Klymit X frame. I use the 3/4 length and the Sea to Summit inflatable pillow for a good nights sleep.[/color]  
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: Danene on 12:16:32, 04/06/18

I have the LightHeart SoLong 6 with awning and two doors. Looked at, bought and tried the solo, but was too cramped for me. I also didn't like the wasted space in the pointed ends.  

 
Only problem in FL summer is condensation. Seam sealed it myself with the recommended 1/2 - 1/2 mineral spirits and 100% silicone caulking and have had NO leaks.  

 
I'm 220 #, 6'2". SoLong 6 fits great
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: marmottungsten on 15:14:10, 04/06/18
I have the LightHeart SoLong 6 with awning and two doors. Looked at, bought and tried the solo, but was too cramped for me. I also didn't like the wasted space in the pointed ends.


Only problem in FL summer is condensation. Seam sealed it myself with the recommended 1/2 - 1/2 mineral spirits and 100% silicone caulking and have had NO leaks.


I'm 220 #, 6'2". SoLong 6 fits great


If it gets condensation, you should be saying solong to it and getting another tent!
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: beefy on 17:11:50, 04/06/18
I have the LightHeart SoLong 6 with awning and two doors. Looked at, bought and tried the solo, but was too cramped for me. I also didn't like the wasted space in the pointed ends.


Only problem in FL summer is condensation. Seam sealed it myself with the recommended 1/2 - 1/2 mineral spirits and 100% silicone caulking and have had NO leaks.
I'm 220 #, 6'2". SoLong 6 fits great
You may find this useful
https://mountainsforeverybody.com/prevent-tent-condensation (https://mountainsforeverybody.com/prevent-tent-condensation)

"The reality is that you cannot prevent tent condensation, this is a normal physical process. It comes due to the cooling of the hot air inside the tent on the walls of the tent. The vapor from the air loses its energy in contact with the cold wall and it transforms into the liquid."  
"Here is a nice video by MSR with some details about condensation in the tent. I am a physicist by profession and can say they have described the phenomenon quite accurately. Please have a look"  
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: alan de enfield on 17:25:47, 04/06/18
You may find this useful
https://mountainsforeverybody.com/prevent-tent-condensation (https://mountainsforeverybody.com/prevent-tent-condensation)

"The reality is that you cannot prevent tent condensation, this is a normal physical process. It comes due to the cooling of the hot air inside the tent on the walls of the tent. The vapor from the air loses its energy in contact with the cold wall and it transforms into the liquid."  
"Here is a nice video by MSR with some details about condensation in the tent. I am a physicist by profession and can say they have described the phenomenon quite accurately. Please have a look"  



I have saved the link - it may come in useful next time one of the 'super-lightweighters' with a single skin tent or tarpaulin get into deep and meaningful discussions about condensation.


Its a good video clip - thanks.
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: beefy on 17:28:15, 04/06/18

I have saved the link - it may come in useful next time one of the 'super-lightweighters' with a single skin tent or tarpaulin get into deep and meaningful discussions about condensation.


Its a good video clip - thanks.
Your very welcome Alan  ;D
Title: Re: Tent Comparisons
Post by: fernman on 17:44:44, 04/06/18
A little breeze throughout the night does wonders to minimise it, though  :)