Sounds an interesting read, I welcome any expression of thought challenging the notion that our countryside is made up of 'Private Land', excepting Rights of
Way and Open Access.
I found the author of the article in the Guardian, mentioned in a topic a month or so ago abit airy fairly about the reasons to trespass. I would be interested to know how this author expresses his reasons and the rewards he gets from his trespass. As far as I can understand about the law is there no real basis to say that it is illegal to walk in open countryside, the laws that are used are there to protect property and the products of agriculture. I is only the legacy of a class system that places the occupier of our countryside as the authority that restricts the full sharing of that part of the asset of land, which provides leisure and pastoral relief.
The danger is ignoring the practical aspects that trespass has to offer, whereas 'waxing lyrical' about the romance of a trespass, without learning how we could be better sharing those parts of the countryside is an intellectual dead end. Expressing the romance of a trespass is a recognition of the sensual part, which goes a long way to contribute to the health issues many suffer from urban life, but this must be linked with practical expression.
I look forward to some interesting discussion from those, who read this book, hopefully. Yet to read it myself, not in my Christmas stocking, wondering if it worth the purchase.
masochist stocking