... I do have trouble in finding the starting points of walks which probably sounds daft ...
Does not sound daft, sounds like normal. Even with one of Ridge's extra guidebooks the first 100 metres are often the worst to find. This is so prevalent I surmise some discriminatory trait in authors.
I think authors have eyes only for the hard bits way up high which lie ahead and can't lower their sights to our getting off the train, bus, car and wondering if the potential new road layout, demolished building, new building, changed signs, cut down trees, ... are worth expending analytic and descriptive energy on.
Don't ask me to describe the day we pfaffed about ,went on ahead, had a wonderful day of walking, tramped, as it said 'back to the start' and discovered we started 2 or 300 mtr off beam and the first 3 miles were parallel to the correct route. It was a glorious day nonetheless.