Having a stab at something again is a good thing.
Some people feel it is immature and that people, particularly males, should have grown out of it.
I still find the world/universe a fascinating place, and it is even more fun now I have more knowledge.
A few years back I made a catamaran, many people said it was not possible, but 5 sheets of cheap ply, a saw, clamps, nailgun and glue later, I had something that fitted in the back of the car (made it to fit), almost watertight, and was great fun on the estuary.
But back to the wonders of the universe, Richard Feynman had this to say on it.
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes taken a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say "look how beautiful it is," and I’ll agree. Then he says "I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing," and I think that he’s kind of nutty. First of all, the beauty that he sees is available to other people and to me too, I believe, although I might not be quite as refined aesthetically as he is, I can appreciate the beauty of a flower.
At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this dimension, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller dimensions, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the colors in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it is interesting; it means that insects can see the color. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower forms? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the science knowledge only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don’t understand how it subtracts.