Now not sure I know what I was supposed to be answering.
.
Sorry I am not sure I can be clearer. In your own words, why do you think the CLA, as an organisation, opposes more rights of way and access reform?
Supplementary question, how and why has this policy changed under the current management?
Please:
Don't refer to the corruption of the Definitive Map - while it may be a cause of the present situation, it not a credible reason for continued opposition by CLA and would not be offered in print.
Don't offer loss of face as a reason - it may be true but "we would look stupid" is not credible amd would also never appear in print.
Don't say the "because they are all toffs!" because they aren't and it would never be offered as a reason even if it were true.
The reason I am asking is twofold. Firstly in your posts as far as I can recall, while condeming the CLA's policy you have not explained fully the reasons behind it. Secondly, to take the debate forward, we need to know why those who oppose access reform feel the way they do so we can better understand their position and try to change it as and when we meet them..